Hannu Kailajärvi, the main suspect of investment club WinCapita, criticizes the director of investigations of KRP (National Bureau of Investigation, NBI) as biased, despotic and wrongful in his letter from prison. Kailajärvi accuses police also of betraying the promises and violations of human rights. (Kailajärvi’s whole letter below).
For the time being Hannu Kailajärvi has decided also to refuse from co-operation of pre-trial investigation with police. Kailajärvi reveals his shocking experiences in the prison of Oulu. "I was kept completely separated for a half-year-time in the dark, dirty and cold basement cell. Its walls and floor was full of people’s excretions and window was broken. Cell is called ”rund” between prisoners and it is used as a punishment in disciplinary actions. ” According to Kailajärvi this method can be called some kind of pressure and torture.
Kailajärvi says that the director of KRP investigations, Seppo Rautava, gave biased and flagrant statement in detention trial in district court 28.9.2009: "If Hannu Kailajärvi would be given a chance to continue developing further his currency trading signal system and forward it to the use of WinCapita members, it would be the same if the murder weapon would be given back to the murderer.”
“Maria Vuorivirta-Heikkinen has promised in June 2009 that KRP’s announcements will be first given to me, and I have a chance to comment them for to avoid errors before publishing. There was only one announcement which I was able to comment. However, the promise has been broken and I feel the procedure as a lie, writes Kailajärvi. According to Kailajärvi KRP has presented arguments through the prosecutor to the district court, where they had no need to show their witnesses correctly.
"The possibility to repeal these arguments without hearing witnesses has been denied from my advocacy, because witnesses have been denied. I feel that director of KRP investigations has consciously mislead district court and the fulfillment of the justice”, writes Kailajärvi. In Kailajärvi’s view KRP should be neutral and not to announce far-reaching interpretation of pre-trial investigation. This has not happened, states Kailajärvi.
"Pre-trial investigation has been achieved in a way so that relevant material for my defense has not been actively collected, or if it has come out, it has not been taken into account. Despite of many requests my pre-trial investigation material (which KRP has shown to me) has not been forwarded to my defenseman. “I feel that there have been done many violations of human rights in the pre-trial investigation”, reveals Kailajärvi.
Because of above-mentioned things, using the possibilities given by the law, I deny answer their questions if director of KRP Seppo Rautava and Maria Vuorivirta-Heikkinen will continue their work in case WinCapita, writes Kailajärvi.
Hannu Kailajärvi’s letter:
I want to comment following 21.10.2009
I feel that operation and operation methods of director of investigation are biased, despotic and wrongful. The director of investigation has lost his trust frequently by brake his verbal promises, which he has proposed to me. The director of investigation has caused a lot of emotional suffers for innocent people by doing despotic deprivations of freedom and seizures of properties; with his information he has maintained lying and wrong images of WinCapita’s operation, and prevent in every way correction of lying and wrong information.
In spring 2009, the director of investigation, Seppo Rautava, has many times adduced that the strict control measures of my pretrial detention would be cancelled at least before Midsummer, and many times before that. This has not happened. The deadline has been more than 4 months ago and the end cannot be seen. In these conversations the primary matter has been removal of visiting rights of my girlfriend.
I was kept completely separated for a half-year-time in the dark, dirty and cold basement cell, which walls and floor was full of people’s excretions and window was broken. Cell is called ”rund” between prisoners and it is used as a punishment in disciplinary actions. This method can be called as some kind of pressure and torture. After half-year-time I was moved from the basement to sk. normal cell dept. where I can meet some other prisoners, but this is not removal of limitations.
Director of KRP investigations, Seppo Rautava, gave biased and flagrant statement in detention trial in district court 28.9.2009: " If Hannu Kailajärvi would be given a chance to continue developing further his currency trading signal system and forward it to the use of WinCapita members, it would be the same if the murder weapon would be given back to the murderer.”
Detective Inspector Maria Vuorivirta-Heikkinen was a witness in the same detention trial in district court 28.9.2009. She did not respond to clear and straight question concerning prosecutor's justification of detention period that in recent investigations had found new, foreign bank accounts which alleged lost money would has been transferred. All accounts and financial operations have already been reviewed in February 2009.
Maria Vuorivirta-Heikkinen has promised in June 2009 that KRP’s announcements will be first given to me, and I have a chance to comment them for to avoid errors before publishing. There was only one announcement which I was able to comment. However, the promise has been broken and I feel the procedure as a lie. KRP has continuously given press releases to the public which maintain false images of WinCapita’s activities and of my pre-trial statements.
Limitation operations of freedom of speech violate human rights. KRP has presented arguments through the prosecutor to the district court, where they had no need to show their witnesses correctly.
The possibility to repeal these arguments without hearing witnesses has been denied from my advocacy, because witnesses have been denied. I feel that director of KRP investigations has consciously misled district court and the fulfillment of the justice.
KRP should be neutral and not to announce far-reaching interpretation of pre-trial investigation. This has not happened. Pre-trial investigation has been achieved in a way so that relevant material for my defense has not been actively collected, or if it has come out, it has not been taken into account.
Despite of many requests my pre-trial investigation material, which KRP has shown to me, has not been forwarded to my defense man. I feel that many violations of human rights have been done in the pre-trial investigation.
Because of above-mentioned things, using the possibilities given by the law, I deny answer the questions of Seppo Rautava,director of investigation, and Maria Vuorivirta-Heikkinen, as long as they continue their work in case WinCapita.
(www.sanomat24.fi)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment